Back-Camembert vs Kritsinia me tiri
Overall, Kritsinia me tiri has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Back-Camembert | Kritsinia me tiri |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 302 kcal | 444 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 16.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Back-Camembert has 32% fewer calories (302 kcal vs 444 kcal).
- Kritsinia me tiri has 14% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 9 g).
- Kritsinia me tiri has no sugar, while Back-Camembert has 7 g.
- Kritsinia me tiri has 22% more protein (16.7 g vs 13 g).
- Only Back-Camembert lists: Milk.
- Only Kritsinia me tiri lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Back-Camembert
67% Camembert (45% Fett 1.Tr.) (pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab), 33% Panade (Weizenmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Speisesalz, Hefe, Paprika). Wildpreiselbeer Dip Zutaten: Zucker, 45% Wildpreiselbeeren, Geliermittel: Pektine; Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Kritsinia me tiri
Wheat flour, extra virgin olive oil 15%, hard cheese 11%, traditional leaven, water, yeast, salt. It may contain traces of sesame seeds and dried nuts (almond, walnuts)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Back-Camembert or Kritsinia me tiri?
Overall, Kritsinia me tiri has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Back-Camembert has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 444 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsinia me tiri has less sugar: 0 g versus 7 g per 100 g.