Comparison

Atún claro al natural vs Atún al natural

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAtún claro al naturalAtún al natural
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 97 kcal 68 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 23 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún al natural has 30% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 97 kcal).
  • Atún claro al natural has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has 50% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has 35% more protein (23 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Atún al natural lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Atún claro al natural

Tunnus albacares, agua, sal

Atún al natural

Atún claro (Thunnus albocares/Thunnus obesus), agua y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Atún claro al natural or Atún al natural?

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún al natural has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons