Aromates pour salade vs Pousses de bambou
Overall, Pousses de bambou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aromates pour salade | Pousses de bambou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pousses de bambou has 75% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Pousses de bambou has 40% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Pousses de bambou has 67% less sugar (1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Aromates pour salade has 67% more fiber (3.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Aromates pour salade has 65% more protein (2.9 g vs 1 g).
- Only Aromates pour salade lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Aromates pour salade
Oignon 50%, persil 25%, ail 12%, ciboulette 6%, poivre noir 4%, piment doux 3%, _sulfites_
Pousses de bambou
Pousses de bambou, eau Produit en Chine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aromates pour salade or Pousses de bambou?
Overall, Pousses de bambou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pousses de bambou has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pousses de bambou has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.