Comparison

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte vs Caramel Latte Flavour

Overall, ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientARCTIC COFFEE carmel latteCaramel Latte Flavour
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 55 kcal 412 kcal
Fat 1 g 10.6 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 8.8 g
Sugars 7.4 g 51.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 2.4 g
Protein 2.8 g 8.8 g
Additives33
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 87% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 412 kcal).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 91% less fat (1 g vs 10.6 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 92% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 8.8 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 86% less sugar (7.4 g vs 51.2 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Caramel Latte Flavour has 68% more protein (8.8 g vs 2.8 g).

Ingredients

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte

1% Fat MILK (76%), coffee (water, coffee powder*) (20%), sugar, stabilisers (cellulose, cellulose gum), natural flavourings, caramelised sugar powder, acidity regulator: sodium phosphates.

Caramel Latte Flavour

Sugar, skimmed MILK powder (21%), glucose syrup, coconut oil, coffee (7.5%) (instant coffee (7%), roast and ground coffee), lactose (MILK), natural flavourings, acidity regulators (sodium bicarbonate, citric acid), salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte or Caramel Latte Flavour?

Overall, ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 412 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 51.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons