Apple Mango Fruit Sauce vs Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars
Overall, Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Apple Mango Fruit Sauce
Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Apple Mango Fruit Sauce | Wild Blueberry Sauce Without... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13.3 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Apple | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has no fat, while Apple Mango Fruit Sauce has 0.4 g.
- Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has 25% less sugar (10 g vs 13.3 g).
- Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has 83% more fiber (6.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has 63% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.4 g).
- Apple Mango Fruit Sauce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Apple Mango Fruit Sauce lists: Apple.
Ingredients
Apple Mango Fruit Sauce
Apple, Mango, Concentrated Lemon Juice (if necessary)
Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars
Wild Blueberries* 100%. *Ingredients from Organic Farming Contains Sugars From Fruits.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Apple Mango Fruit Sauce or Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars?
Overall, Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apple Mango Fruit Sauce has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Blueberry Sauce Without Added Sugars has less sugar: 10 g versus 13.3 g per 100 g.