Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate vs Calendrier de l'Avent
Overall, Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Antiu Xixona Barquillo relle... | Calendrier de l'Avent |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 474 kcal | 547 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 31.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 56.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 13% fewer calories (474 kcal vs 547 kcal).
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 37% less fat (20 g vs 31.9 g).
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 80% less saturated fat (4 g vs 20 g).
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 13% less sugar (49 g vs 56.3 g).
- Calendrier de l'Avent has 18% more protein (6 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate
Not available.
Calendrier de l'Avent
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate or Calendrier de l'Avent?
Overall, Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has fewer calories: 474 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has less sugar: 49 g versus 56.3 g per 100 g.