Comparison

Glühweinzauber vs Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate

Overall, Glühweinzauber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGlühweinzauberAntiu Xixona Barquillo relle...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 398 kcal 474 kcal
Fat 0 g 20 g
Saturated fat 0 g 4 g
Sugars 96 g 49 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 0 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Glühweinzauber has 16% fewer calories (398 kcal vs 474 kcal).
  • Glühweinzauber has no fat, while Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 20 g.
  • Glühweinzauber has no saturated fat, while Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 4 g.
  • Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 49% less sugar (49 g vs 96 g).
  • Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 100% more protein (4.9 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Glühweinzauber

Kandisfarin, natürliches Aroma.

Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Glühweinzauber or Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate?

Overall, Glühweinzauber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Glühweinzauber has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 474 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has less sugar: 49 g versus 96 g per 100 g.

More comparisons