Glühweinzauber vs Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate
Overall, Glühweinzauber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Glühweinzauber
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Glühweinzauber | Antiu Xixona Barquillo relle... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 474 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 96 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Glühweinzauber has 16% fewer calories (398 kcal vs 474 kcal).
- Glühweinzauber has no fat, while Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 20 g.
- Glühweinzauber has no saturated fat, while Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 4 g.
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 49% less sugar (49 g vs 96 g).
- Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has 100% more protein (4.9 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Glühweinzauber
Kandisfarin, natürliches Aroma.
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Glühweinzauber or Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate?
Overall, Glühweinzauber has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Glühweinzauber has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 474 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antiu Xixona Barquillo relleno de chocolate has less sugar: 49 g versus 96 g per 100 g.