Ambiante manon blanc vs White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles
Overall, White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Ambiante manon blanc
White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ambiante manon blanc | White chocolate & Cranberry... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 559 kcal | 576 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 37.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20.3 g |
| Sugars | 58 g | 5.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has 91% less sugar (5.5 g vs 58 g).
- Ambiante manon blanc has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has 35% more protein (5.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ambiante manon blanc
Not available.
White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles
White Chocolate 60% (sugar, cocoa butter, whole milk powder, emulsifier: soy lecithin, vanilla extract] cranberry filling 40% vegetable fat (palm, sunflower, rapeseed) sugar, skimmed milk powder, milk sugar, emulsifier say lecithin), freeze dried cranberry
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ambiante manon blanc or White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles?
Overall, White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ambiante manon blanc has fewer calories: 559 kcal versus 576 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White chocolate & Cranberry Truffles has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 58 g per 100 g.