Ambiante manon blanc vs Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30%
Overall, Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Ambiante manon blanc
Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ambiante manon blanc | Tablette de chocolat Blanc C... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 559 kcal | 601 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 44.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 58 g | 40.2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ambiante manon blanc has 23% less fat (34 g vs 44.1 g).
- Ambiante manon blanc has 13% less saturated fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has 31% less sugar (40.2 g vs 58 g).
- Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has 46% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has 62% more protein (9.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% lists: Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Ambiante manon blanc
Not available.
Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30%
Beurre de cacao, sucre de canne, LAIT en poudre, NOISETTE (7%), sucre, PISTACHE (6%), noix de coco râpée (5%), émulsifiant : lécithines
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ambiante manon blanc or Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30%?
Overall, Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ambiante manon blanc has fewer calories: 559 kcal versus 601 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tablette de chocolat Blanc Calin Oryola 30% has less sugar: 40.2 g versus 58 g per 100 g.