Amande intense vs Boisson amande bq 1l
Overall, Boisson amande bq 1l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amande intense | Boisson amande bq 1l |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts, Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.) |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boisson amande bq 1l has 57% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Boisson amande bq 1l has 70% less fat (1.2 g vs 4 g).
- Boisson amande bq 1l has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Boisson amande bq 1l has 28% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4 g).
- Amande intense has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Amande intense has 50% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Boisson amande bq 1l has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Boisson amande bq 1l lists: Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.).
Ingredients
Amande intense
Eau, Amandes* 7%, Sucre de canne non raffiné*, Maltodextrine de maïs*, Arôme naturel d'amande, Sel marin. Peut contenir d'autres fruits à coque. *Ingrédients biologiques
Boisson amande bq 1l
Eau, sucre, purée d'amande 2%, extrait d'algue Lithothamnium calcareum, sel marin, stabilisant : gomme gellane, vitamines : riboflavine (B2), B12, D, E.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amande intense or Boisson amande bq 1l?
Overall, Boisson amande bq 1l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boisson amande bq 1l has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boisson amande bq 1l has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.