Almette - Tomaten-Pesto vs Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder
Overall, Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Almette - Tomaten-Pesto | Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 247 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has 70% fewer calories (74 kcal vs 247 kcal).
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 23 g).
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 15 g).
- Almette - Tomaten-Pesto has 54% less sugar (3.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has no salt, while Almette - Tomaten-Pesto has 1.4 g.
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has 40% more protein (9.6 g vs 5.8 g).
- Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Almette - Tomaten-Pesto
_Frischkäse_, 4% Tomaten, Tomatenmark, Basilikum, Oregano, Thymian, Gewürze (Zwiebeln, Knoblauch, Pfeffer), Speisesalz, Stärke, Branntweinessig, Stickstoff zum Aufschlagen
Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder
Frischkäse, 4,3% Heidelbeeren, 4,3% schwarze Holunderbeeren, Zucker, Stärke, natürliches Aroma, Zitronensaftkonzentrat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Almette - Tomaten-Pesto or Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder?
Overall, Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr Heidelbeer-Holunder has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 247 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Almette - Tomaten-Pesto has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.