Alentaja vs ProActiv
Overall, ProActiv has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alentaja | ProActiv |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 310 kcal |
| Fat | 60 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ProActiv has 43% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 540 kcal).
- ProActiv has 42% less fat (35 g vs 60 g).
- ProActiv has 38% less saturated fat (8.1 g vs 13 g).
- Alentaja has no sugar, while ProActiv has 0.5 g.
- ProActiv has 67% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- ProActiv has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Alentaja
Rypsiöljy (43%), vesi, kasvisteroliesteri (kasvisterolia 7,5 %), kasvirasvat (SG-palmu** ja kookos vaihtelevina osuuksina), suola (0,9%), emulgointiaineet (E471 kasvirasvasta, auringonkukkalesitiini), aromit, A-ja D₂-vitamiini, väri (beta-karoteeni). RASVAPITOISUUS 60%. LAKTOOSITON. MAIDOTON. ** Kestävän kehityksen mukaisesti tuotettua ja sertifioitua palmuöljyä.
ProActiv
woda, oleje roślinne (olej słonecznikowy, olej palmowy, olej lniany, olej rzepakowy), estry steroli roślinnych (11%), sól (0,3%), emulgatory (mono - i diglicerydy kwasów tłuszczowych, lecytyny), aromat, witaminy A i D.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alentaja or ProActiv?
Overall, ProActiv has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ProActiv has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 540 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alentaja has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.