Alentaja maukas vs ProActiv
Overall, ProActiv has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alentaja maukas | ProActiv |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 310 kcal |
| Fat | 60 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ProActiv has 43% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 540 kcal).
- ProActiv has 42% less fat (35 g vs 60 g).
- ProActiv has 46% less saturated fat (8.1 g vs 15 g).
- Alentaja maukas has no sugar, while ProActiv has 0.5 g.
- ProActiv has 67% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- ProActiv has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- ProActiv has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Alentaja maukas
Rypsiöljy (42%), vesi, kasvirasvat (kookos, shea), kasvisteroliesteri (kasvisterolia 7,5%), suola (0,9 %), emulgointiaine (rypsilesitiini), A - ja D-vitamiinit, luontaiset aromit, väri (beta-karoteeni). RASVAPITOISUUS 60 %. MAIDOTON.
ProActiv
woda, oleje roślinne (olej słonecznikowy, olej palmowy, olej lniany, olej rzepakowy), estry steroli roślinnych (11%), sól (0,3%), emulgatory (mono - i diglicerydy kwasów tłuszczowych, lecytyny), aromat, witaminy A i D.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alentaja maukas or ProActiv?
Overall, ProActiv has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ProActiv has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 540 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alentaja maukas has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.