Comparison
Airelles au naturel vs Rode bessen
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Airelles au naturel | Rode bessen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode bessen has 44% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Rode bessen has no fat, while Airelles au naturel has 0.4 g.
- Rode bessen has 15% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.3 g).
- Rode bessen has 90% more protein (1 g vs 0.1 g).
- Rode bessen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Airelles au naturel
Airelles, eau, sucre
Rode bessen
rode bessen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Airelles au naturel or Rode bessen?
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode bessen has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode bessen has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.