Comparison
Airelles vs Rode bessen
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Airelles | Rode bessen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode bessen has 84% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Rode bessen has no fat, while Airelles has 0.5 g.
- Rode bessen has 89% less sugar (4.5 g vs 40 g).
- Rode bessen has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rode bessen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Airelles
Not available.
Rode bessen
rode bessen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Airelles or Rode bessen?
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode bessen has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode bessen has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 40 g per 100 g.