Rode bessen vs Wildpreiselbeeren Marmelade
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rode bessen | Wildpreiselbeeren Marmelade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | — |
| Protein | 1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode bessen has 83% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Rode bessen has 89% less sugar (4.5 g vs 42 g).
- Rode bessen has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- Rode bessen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rode bessen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rode bessen
rode bessen
Wildpreiselbeeren Marmelade
55% Preiselbeeren, Zucker, Wasser, Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Geliermittel Pektin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode bessen or Wildpreiselbeeren Marmelade?
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode bessen has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode bessen has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 42 g per 100 g.