Comparison
Abricots vs Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricots | Süßes Soft-Aprikosen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 193 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 32 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 16% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 63% more fiber (4.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Abricots has 26% more protein (2.7 g vs 2 g).
- Only Süßes Soft-Aprikosen lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Abricots
Abricots
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Aprikosen ensteint und getrocknet, Antioxidationsmittel: Schwefeldioxid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricots or Süßes Soft-Aprikosen?
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has less sugar: 32 g versus 34 g per 100 g.