6111250476973 vs Empanado Picante (Pollo)
Overall, Empanado Picante (Pollo) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 6111250476973 | Empanado Picante (Pollo) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 189 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 9 | 5 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Empanado Picante (Pollo) has 37% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.6 g).
- 6111250476973 has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Empanado Picante (Pollo) has 21% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Empanado Picante (Pollo) has 43% more protein (15.6 g vs 8.8 g).
- Only 6111250476973 lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
6111250476973
Viande de bœuf, viande de dinde, eau, sel, huile, proteines de soja, fécule de pomme de terre, dextrine, épices, arome, sucre, dextrose, exhausteur de goût (E621), conservateurs (E250,E262), stabilisateurs (E450, E451), antioxydants (E301,E325), arôme de fumée, colorant (E120). يحفظ في 6 درجة مئوية. يستهلك قبل : انظر تاريخ انتهاء الصلاحية منتوج مغربي - صنع من طرف مجازر كوباك لحوم - لسطاح . 83000 تارودانت - المغرب BIM STORES: Parc Logistica, Route 3000, Ain Harrouda C9-C12 Mohammadia
Empanado Picante (Pollo)
Carne de pollo (53%), agua, fibra vegetal, sal, aromas, estabilizantes (carragenanos y goma garrofín). Cobertura (35%): Harina de maíz, pan rallado (harina de arroz, dextrosa, sal y extractos de especias), aceite de girasol, especias, sal, almidón, extractos de especias, gasificantes (difosfatos y carbonatos sódicos) y azúcar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 6111250476973 or Empanado Picante (Pollo)?
Overall, Empanado Picante (Pollo) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
6111250476973 has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
6111250476973 has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.