Comparison

36 escargots de Bourgogne vs Escargots de Bourgogne

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient36 escargots de BourgogneEscargots de Bourgogne
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — —
Calories 340 kcal 292 kcal
Fat 33 g 26 g
Saturated fat 22 g 17 g
Sugars 0 g 0.9 g
Salt 1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0.9 g
Protein 8.6 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 14% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 340 kcal).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 21% less fat (26 g vs 33 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 23% less saturated fat (17 g vs 22 g).
  • 36 escargots de Bourgogne has no sugar, while Escargots de Bourgogne has 0.9 g.
  • 36 escargots de Bourgogne has 27% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 33% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 22% more protein (11 g vs 8.6 g).
  • 36 escargots de Bourgogne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

36 escargots de Bourgogne

Not available.

Escargots de Bourgogne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 36 escargots de Bourgogne or Escargots de Bourgogne?

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Escargots de Bourgogne has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

36 escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons