12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne vs Escargots de Bourgogne
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne
Escargots de Bourgogne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 12 escargots prepares a la B... | Escargots de Bourgogne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 290 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.1 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk, Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 50% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 20% more protein (11 g vs 8.8 g).
- Only 12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne lists: Celery, Milk, Molluscs.
Ingredients
12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne
50% chairs d'escargots (mollusques) cuites (Hellix lucorum) (Origines: Turquie, Roumanie, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Bulgarie, Albanie, Serbie, Grèce, Macédoine), 31% beurre (lait), eau, 2,9% persil, 2,1% ail déshydraté, échalote, 0,8% ail, sel, épices, plantes aromatiques (contient céleri). Traces éventuelles de poissons, de soja, de crustacés, de céréales contenant du gluten, d'œufs et de sulfites.
Escargots de Bourgogne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne or Escargots de Bourgogne?
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
12 escargots prepares a la Bourguignonne has fewer calories: 290 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.