2964846673946 vs Skyr
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2964846673946 | Skyr |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 315 kcal | 139 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr has 56% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 315 kcal).
- Skyr has 70% less fat (9 g vs 30 g).
- Skyr has 70% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 19 g).
- 2964846673946 has 44% less sugar (2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Skyr has 37% more protein (10.3 g vs 6.5 g).
- Only Skyr lists: Milk.
Ingredients
2964846673946
Not available.
Skyr
_Queso_ fresco (_suero de mantequilla_, _nata_, _proteínas de la leche_, cultivos microbianos [contienen _leche_]), 15% _skyr_ (_leche_ desnatada, cuajo microbiano, cultivos microbianos [contienen _leche_]), sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2964846673946 or Skyr?
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2964846673946 has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.