280™ Bacon vs Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)
Overall, 280™ Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
280™ Bacon
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 280™ Bacon | Burger King Impossible Whopp... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 244 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 13.4 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 22% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 36% less fat (8.6 g vs 13.4 g).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 73% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 6 g).
- 280™ Bacon has 63% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 67% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- 280™ Bacon has 31% more protein (14 g vs 9.7 g).
- 280™ Bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
- 280™ Bacon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 280™ Bacon lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds.
- Only Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
280™ Bacon
Pain, cheddar fondu, emmental fondu, steak haché, bacon fumé, oignons, rondelles de tomate, ketchup, sauce
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)
water, soy protein concentrate, coconut oil, sunflower oil, natural flavors, 2% or less of: potato protein, methylcellulose, yeast extract, cultured dextrose, food starch modified, soy leghemoglobin, salt, soy protein isolate, mixed tocopherols (vitamin e), zinc gluconate, thiamine hydrochloride (vitamin b1), sodium ascorbate (vitamin c), niacin, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin b6), riboflavin (vitamin b2), vitamin b12
FAQ
Which is healthier: 280™ Bacon or Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)?
Overall, 280™ Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
280™ Bacon has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.