Double Steakhouse vs 280™ Bacon
Overall, 280™ Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Double Steakhouse | 280™ Bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 295 kcal | 244 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 13.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Milch, Senf, Sesam, Weizen | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 280™ Bacon has 17% fewer calories (244 kcal vs 295 kcal).
- 280™ Bacon has 29% less fat (13.4 g vs 19 g).
- 280™ Bacon has 30% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8.5 g).
- 280™ Bacon has 71% less sugar (1.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Double Steakhouse has 12% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- 280™ Bacon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Double Steakhouse lists: Milch, Senf, Sesam, Weizen.
- Only 280™ Bacon lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Double Steakhouse
pain, eclats de maïs, steak haché de boeuf, sauce barbecue, mayonnaise, bacon, oignon, cheddar fondu, salade, tomates. allergènes présents : lait, Gluten, œuf, moutarde
280™ Bacon
Pain, cheddar fondu, emmental fondu, steak haché, bacon fumé, oignons, rondelles de tomate, ketchup, sauce
FAQ
Which is healthier: Double Steakhouse or 280™ Bacon?
Overall, 280™ Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
280™ Bacon has fewer calories: 244 kcal versus 295 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
280™ Bacon has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.