Comparison
24 vs Nata para cocinar
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | 24 | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 12.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 12% less sugar (3.7 g vs 4.2 g).
- 24 has 14% more protein (2.8 g vs 2.4 g).
- Only Nata para cocinar lists: Milk.
Ingredients
24
Not available.
Nata para cocinar
light milk cream, natural starch, milk proteins,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or Nata para cocinar?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para cocinar has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.