Comparison

2 Filets de Canard Rôtis vs Rôti de magret de canard

Overall, 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient2 Filets de Canard RôtisRôti de magret de canard
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 165 kcal 333 kcal
Fat 8.7 g 29 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 10 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.5 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 20 g 17 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 50% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 333 kcal).
  • 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 70% less fat (8.7 g vs 29 g).
  • 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 71% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 10 g).
  • Rôti de magret de canard has 27% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Rôti de magret de canard has 61% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
  • 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 15% more protein (20 g vs 17 g).
  • Rôti de magret de canard is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

2 Filets de Canard Rôtis

Filets de canard origine France, eau, sel, dextrose de blé, arôme naturel, fécule de pomme de terre, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. 111 g de filet de canard pour 100 g de produit fini.

Rôti de magret de canard

magret de canard du Sud Ouest (Origine France) 98%, sel, ail, poivre, herbes de Provence. piment d'Espelette (0,15%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis or Rôti de magret de canard?

Overall, 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rôti de magret de canard has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons