2 Filets de Canard Rôtis vs Roasted Duck Boneless
Overall, Roasted Duck Boneless has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis | Roasted Duck Boneless |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 8.7 g | 17.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 37% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 50% less fat (8.7 g vs 17.5 g).
- 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has 47% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 5.5 g).
- Roasted Duck Boneless has 82% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Roasted Duck Boneless has 47% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Roasted Duck Boneless has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Roasted Duck Boneless is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
2 Filets de Canard Rôtis
Filets de canard origine France, eau, sel, dextrose de blé, arôme naturel, fécule de pomme de terre, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. 111 g de filet de canard pour 100 g de produit fini.
Roasted Duck Boneless
Duck 98%, salt, sugar, spices (cinnamon, cloves, anise, fennel), pepper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2 Filets de Canard Rôtis or Roasted Duck Boneless?
Overall, Roasted Duck Boneless has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2 Filets de Canard Rôtis has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roasted Duck Boneless has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.