Nutrition report ready

Trifle Sponge Fingers

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Marks & Spencer product.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Trifle Sponge Fingers

by Marks & Spencer in Cakes Barcode 00629409
Bad nutritional quality

Trifle Sponge Fingers by Marks & Spencer provides 405 kcal per 100 g, with 49.7 g of sugars and 7.6 g of protein. That is 56% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Cakes category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
3.3 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
0.8 g · Low
Sugars
49.7 g · High
Salt
0.3 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 405 kcal 389
Total fat 3.3 g 18.2 −82%
Saturated fat 0.8 g 7.4 −89%
Carbohydrates 85 g 51.9 +64%
Total sugars 49.7 g 31.8 +56%
Protein 7.6 g 4.7 +60%
Salt 0.3 g 0.7 −50%

Category average across 9263 Cakes products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other cakes

Calories higher 42%
Sugars higher 5%
Salt lower 19%
Saturated fat lower 3%
Protein top 8%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
United Kingdom
Barcode
00629409

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Trifle Sponge Fingers?

Trifle Sponge Fingers contains 405 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Trifle Sponge Fingers?

Trifle Sponge Fingers has 49.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Trifle Sponge Fingers healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Trifle Sponge Fingers? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More cakes

View all →

More from Marks & Spencer

View all →