Nutrition report ready

Triángulo de manzana

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Triángulo de manzana

in Sweet snacks Barcode 2604402000897
Bad nutritional quality

Triángulo de manzana provides 346 kcal per 100 g, with 19 g of sugars and 4 g of protein. That is 49% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Sweet snacks category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
17 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
12 g · High
Sugars
19 g · Moderate
Salt
0.3 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 346 kcal 427 −19%
Total fat 17 g 18.4 −7%
Saturated fat 12 g 8.6 +40%
Carbohydrates 43 g 58.4 −26%
Total sugars 19 g 37.2 −49%
Dietary fiber 1.2 g 4.5 −73%
Protein 4 g 6.1 −34%
Salt 0.3 g 0.6 −42%

Category average across 2983 Sweet snacks products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sweet snacks

Calories lower 15%
Sugars lower 16%
Salt higher 47%
Saturated fat higher 32%
Protein top 74%
Fiber top 73%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Spain
Barcode
2604402000897

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Triángulo de manzana?

Triángulo de manzana contains 346 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Triángulo de manzana?

Triángulo de manzana has 19 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Triángulo de manzana healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 28, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Triángulo de manzana? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sweet snacks

View all →