View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack
Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack by Frigo provides 375 kcal per 100 g, with 82 g of sugars. That is 120% more sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Sweet snacks category and comes in a 60g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 kcal | 427 −12% |
| Total fat | 1.7 g | 18.4 −91% |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 8.6 −80% |
| Carbohydrates | 89 g | 58.4 +52% |
| Total sugars | 82 g | 37.3 +120% |
| Added sugars | 89.2 g | 28.3 +215% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 −98% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2982 Sweet snacks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other sweet snacks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
89% Dextrose (Traubenzucker), Maltodextrin, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure und L(+)-Weinsäure, pflanzliche Fette (Raps) ganz gehärtet, Trennmittel: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren, Aroma, Glukosesirup
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 60g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4033500101850
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack?
Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack contains 375 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack?
Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack has 82 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Traubenzucker Lollys Kirschgeschmack healthy?
It is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
e NOVA 3 More sweet snacks
View all →
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Frigo
View all →
c NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4