Nutrition report ready

Susamli çubuk kraker

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Susamli çubuk kraker

in Sweet snacks Barcode 88547374
Poor nutritional quality

Susamli çubuk kraker provides 445 kcal per 100 g, with 2.8 g of sugars and 13 g of protein. That is 92% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Sweet snacks category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
16.2 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
6.4 g · High
Sugars
2.8 g · Low
Salt
1.3 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 445 kcal 427
Total fat 16.2 g 18.4 −12%
Saturated fat 6.4 g 8.6 −25%
Carbohydrates 66.5 g 58.4 +14%
Total sugars 2.8 g 37.3 −92%
Dietary fiber 7.1 g 4.5 +59%
Protein 13 g 6.1 +114%
Salt 1.3 g 0.6 +127%

Category average across 2982 Sweet snacks products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sweet snacks

Calories higher 43%
Sugars lower 5%
Salt higher 5%
Saturated fat lower 50%
Protein top 5%
Fiber top 17%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France
Barcode
88547374

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Susamli çubuk kraker?

Susamli çubuk kraker contains 445 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Susamli çubuk kraker?

Susamli çubuk kraker has 2.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Susamli çubuk kraker healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Susamli çubuk kraker? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sweet snacks

View all →