Soft Eating Prunes

by Marks & Spencer 200g in Confectioneries Barcode 00267564
Poor nutritional quality

Soft Eating Prunes by Marks & Spencer provides 217 kcal per 100 g, with 31.3 g of sugars and 1.7 g of protein. That is 43% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Confectioneries category and comes in a 200g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0.7 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.4 g · Low
Sugars
31.3 g · High
Salt
0.1 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 217 kcal 409 −47%
Total fat 0.7 g 9.5 −93%
Saturated fat 0.4 g 6.1 −93%
Carbohydrates 49.1 g 74.3 −34%
Total sugars 31.3 g 54.6 −43%
Added sugars 0 g 39.4 −100%
Protein 1.7 g 3.3 −49%
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 −61%

Category average across 19312 Confectioneries products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other confectioneries

Calories lower 3%
Sugars lower 13%
Salt lower 48%
Saturated fat lower 50%
Protein top 53%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Partially Rehydrated Pitted Prunes

Product details

Quantity
200g
Sold in
France, United Kingdom
Barcode
00267564

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Soft Eating Prunes?

Soft Eating Prunes contains 217 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Soft Eating Prunes?

Soft Eating Prunes has 31.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Soft Eating Prunes healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Soft Eating Prunes? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More confectioneries

View all →

More from Marks & Spencer

View all →