Smalec z miesem i cebula

View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA

Smalec z miesem i cebula

250 g in Lards Barcode 5907509893902
Nutri-Score
Bad nutritional quality
Processing (NOVA)
Processed culinary ingredient
Green-Score
b
Environmental impact estimate

Smalec z miesem i cebula provides 665 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 5.7 g of protein. That is 32% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Lards category and comes in a 250 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
71 g · High
Saturated fat
25 g · High
Sugars
0.5 g · Low
Salt
1.6 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 665 kcal 808 −18%
Total fat 71 g 88 −19%
Saturated fat 25 g 36.8 −32%
Carbohydrates 1.5 g 0.8 +97%
Total sugars 0.5 g 0.4 +32%
Protein 5.7 g 2.7 +114%
Salt 1.6 g 0.9 +86%

Category average across 123 Lards products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other lards

Calories lower 12%
Sugars higher 32%
Salt higher 20%
Saturated fat lower 11%
Protein top 16%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
250 g
Sold in
France, Poland
Barcode
5907509893902

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Smalec z miesem i cebula?

Smalec z miesem i cebula contains 665 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Smalec z miesem i cebula?

Smalec z miesem i cebula has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Smalec z miesem i cebula healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 21, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Smalec z miesem i cebula? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthiest Lards by Nutri-Score Highest-Protein Lards Least Processed Lards Lowest-Calorie Lards Best Low-Sugar Lards

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

Saindoux b NOVA 2
Saindoux
Unknown brand
900 kcal
100 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Nutri-Score B vs E−84% saturated fatno salt
Lard c NOVA 2
Lard
Morrisons
90 kcal
10 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Nutri-Score C vs E−82% saturated fatno salt
Banha de porco c NOVA 2
Banha de porco
ProBar · 220 g
900 kcal
100 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Nutri-Score C vs Eno salt
Lardo del norcino c NOVA 2
Lardo del norcino
Lidl
772 kcal
85 Fat g
0 Sugar g
1.4 Salt g
per 100 g · 2.1 g protein
Nutri-Score C vs E−88% saturated fat

More lards

View all →
Schmalz e NOVA 4
Schmalz
Deli Reform · 200g
833 kcal
91 Fat g
2.3 Sugar g
1.1 Salt g
per 100 g · 0.7 g protein
VeganVegetarian
Butterschmalz 500gr e NOVA 4
Butterschmalz 500gr
Milsani · 1pcs
898 kcal
99.8 Fat g
— Sugar
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Palm oil freeVegetarian 1 allergen
Snow cap lard d
Snow cap lard
Morrell · 16 oz
923 kcal
100 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Lards
Just Lard d NOVA 2
Just Lard
Just Lard · 250 g
891 kcal
99.7 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Lards
Smalec wyborowy d
Smalec wyborowy
Sokołów · 200 g
900 kcal
100 Fat g
0 Sugar g
0 Salt g
per 100 g · 0 g protein
Lards
Grammel Schmalz e
Grammel Schmalz
Schachinger · 150 g
853 kcal
95 Fat g
0.5 Sugar g
1.5 Salt g
per 100 g · 2.4 g protein
Lards