View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis
Fruchtaufstrich Sauerkirsche, Schwarze Johannisbeere
Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis by Schwartau provides 202 kcal per 100 g, with 47.8 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. That is 396% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Plant-based spreads category and comes in a 270 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 202 kcal | 262 −23% |
| Total fat | 0.2 g | 19.9 −99% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4.4 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 47.8 g | 15.1 +217% |
| Total sugars | 47.8 g | 9.6 +396% |
| Added sugars | 29.4 g | 3.7 +695% |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 4.8 −90% |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.3 −98% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 651 Plant-based spreads products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other plant-based spreads
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Fruchtmischung (Sauerkirsche 29%, Schwarze Johannisbeeren 16%), Zucker, Wasser, Geliermittel Pektion (aus Früchten), Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure.
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 270 g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4011800182618
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis?
Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis contains 202 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis?
Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis has 47.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Samt Soft Lilac Kirsch Cassis healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More plant-based spreads
View all →
d 
d 
a NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
a NOVA 4 More from Schwartau
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4