View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg
Sucre
Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg by Saint Louis provides 396 kcal per 100 g, with 99 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 29% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Sugars category and comes in a 1000 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 396 kcal | 304 +30% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 99 g | 89.9 +10% |
| Total sugars | 99 g | 76.9 +29% |
| Added sugars | 100 g | 56.4 +77% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 1.4 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 −81% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2027 Sugars products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other sugars
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Sucre
Product details
- Quantity
- 1000 g
- Labels & certifications
- Vegetarian
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3220033020005
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg?
Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg contains 396 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg?
Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg has 99 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Sachet Sucre Roux de Betterave 1kg healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated June 3, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b 
b NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
d More sugars
View all →
e 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 2 More from Saint Louis
View all →
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2