Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken
Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken by Ruby Tuesday provides 670 kcal per 100 g, with 3 g of sugars and 78 g of protein. That is 66% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Entrees category and comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 670 kcal | 670 kcal | 390 +72% | |
| Total fat | 34 g | 34 g | 44% | 26.4 +29% |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 8 g | 40% | 9.8 −18% |
| Carbohydrates | 13 g | 13 g | 5% | 29.8 −56% |
| Total sugars | 3 g | 3 g | 8.8 −66% | |
| Dietary fiber | 7 g | 7 g | 25% | 3 +134% |
| Protein | 78 g | 78 g | 156% | 28.4 +175% |
| Salt | 7.5 g | 7.5 g | 3.2 +136% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3741 Entrees products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other entrees
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 6189216745816363206650
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken?
Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken contains 670 kcal per 100 g and about 670 kcal per serving (100g).
How much sugar is in Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken?
Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken has 3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Ruby Tuesday, Double Decker Chicken healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More entrees
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4