Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato
Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato by Clement Pappas & Co. Inc. provides 21 kcal per 100 ml, with 2.5 g of sugars and 0.8 g of protein. That is 73% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Plant-based beverages category.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 8 oza (240 ml)
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 21 kcal | 50 kcal | 44 −52% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 4.2 g | 10 g | 4% | 10.4 −60% |
| Total sugars | 2.5 g | 6 g | 9.1 −73% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0.4 g | 1 g | 4% | 0.4 |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 2 g | 4% | 0.3 +140% |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.5 g | 0.1 +335% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 6459 Plant-based beverages products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from July 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other plant-based beverages
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Filtered water, tomato concentrate, salt, citric acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin c).
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Serving size
- 8 oza (240 ml)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0041152120031
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato?
Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato contains 21 kcal per 100 ml and about 50 kcal per serving (8 oza (240 ml)).
How much sugar is in Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato?
Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato has 2.5 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Ruby Kist, 100% Juice, Tomato healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
b 
b NOVA 3 
b NOVA 3 More plant-based beverages
View all →
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
a NOVA 1 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Clement Pappas & Co. Inc.
View all →
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4