View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Retro Baikal
Retro Baikal by Vilniaus Alus provides 40 kcal per 100 g, with 10 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 95% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Carbonated drinks category and comes in a 0.33 l pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 kcal | 26 +53% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 10 g | 5.8 +73% |
| Total sugars | 10 g | 5.1 +95% |
| Added sugars | 5 g | 5.9 −15% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 329 Carbonated drinks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other carbonated drinks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Carbonated water, sugar, citric acid, caramel color, black tea, licorice root and rhizome, eleutherococ root, natural flavourings.
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 0.33 l
- Sold in
- United Kingdom
- Barcode
- 4779020200801
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Retro Baikal?
Retro Baikal contains 40 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Retro Baikal?
Retro Baikal has 10 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Retro Baikal healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 8, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b 
b More carbonated drinks
View all →
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4
b 
c 
d NOVA 4 
