Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna
Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna by Raincoast Trading provides 182 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 27.3 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Seafood category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1/3 cup (55 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 kcal | 100 kcal | 151 +20% | |
| Total fat | 7.3 g | 4 g | 5% | 7.1 |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 1.5 g | 8% | 1.4 +96% |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 4.9 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 1.2 −100% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.4 −100% |
| Protein | 27.3 g | 15 g | 30% | 16.4 +67% |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g | 1.9 −74% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1939 Seafood products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from December 2022. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other seafood
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Albacore tuna, sea salt.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1/3 cup (55 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0810757000112
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna?
Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna contains 182 kcal per 100 g and about 100 kcal per serving (1/3 cup (55 g)).
How much sugar is in Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna?
Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Raincoast trading, solid white albacore tuna healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a 
a 
a NOVA 3 More seafood
View all →
d NOVA 4 
c 
d NOVA 3 
c 
d 
c 
