Nutrition report ready

Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score B

View details

Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens

in Stews Barcode 3770026564028
Good nutritional quality

Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens provides 139 kcal per 100 g, with 1.8 g of sugars and 14 g of protein. That is 18% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Stews category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
7 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
2.5 g · Moderate
Sugars
1.8 g · Low
Salt
0.8 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 139 kcal 99 +41%
Total fat 7 g 3.8 +85%
Saturated fat 2.5 g 1.3 +93%
Carbohydrates 4 g 10.6 −62%
Total sugars 1.8 g 2.2 −18%
Protein 14 g 4.9 +187%
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 −5%

Category average across 1185 Stews products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other stews

Calories higher 12%
Sugars higher 41%
Salt lower 46%
Saturated fat higher 14%
Protein top 2%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France
Barcode
3770026564028

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens?

Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens contains 139 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens?

Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens has 1.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Ragoût de porc aux légumes anciens? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More stews

View all →