Proteina Chocolate

by Eroski in B Barcode 8480010239409
Not enough data to compute

Proteina Chocolate by Eroski provides 392 kcal per 100 g, with 3.5 g of sugars and 72 g of protein. That is 53% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is listed in the B category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
9 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
5.6 g · High
Sugars
3.5 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 100 g

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 392 kcal 392 kcal 225 +74%
Total fat 9 g 9 g 12% 10.3 −12%
Saturated fat 5.6 g 5.6 g 28% 2.6 +119%
Carbohydrates 4.7 g 4.7 g 2% 23.2 −80%
Total sugars 3.5 g 3.5 g 7.5 −53%
Added sugars 0 g 0 g 0% 2.5 −100%
Dietary fiber 2.3 g 2.3 g 8% 4.1 −44%
Protein 72 g 72 g 144% 8.7 +726%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 82 B products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other b

Calories higher 19%
Sugars lower 42%
Saturated fat higher 16%
Protein top 2%
Fiber top 48%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Nada

Product details

Serving size
100 g
Labels & certifications
No added sugar
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010239409

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Proteina Chocolate?

Proteina Chocolate contains 392 kcal per 100 g and about 392 kcal per serving (100 g).

How much sugar is in Proteina Chocolate?

Proteina Chocolate has 3.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 28, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Proteina Chocolate? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More from Eroski

View all →