View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Petto di pollo
Petto di pollo by Coal provides 95 kcal per 100 g, with 0.9 g of sugars and 18 g of protein. That is 15% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Reconstituted chicken breast slices category and comes in a 100 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 kcal | 106 −11% |
| Total fat | 1 g | 2.3 −56% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.7 −57% |
| Carbohydrates | 3 g | 1.9 +61% |
| Total sugars | 0.9 g | 0.8 +15% |
| Added sugars | 0.6 g | 1.2 −48% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.3 −85% |
| Protein | 18 g | 19.6 −8% |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 −5% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 89 Reconstituted chicken breast slices products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other reconstituted chicken breast slices
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Carne di pollo(80%),acqua,amido,aromi,sale,destrosio, stabilizzante:E407,antiossidante:E316,conservante:E250.
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 100 g
- Labels & certifications
- No gluten
- Sold in
- Italy
- Barcode
- 8056711293615
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Petto di pollo?
Petto di pollo contains 95 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Petto di pollo?
Petto di pollo has 0.9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Petto di pollo healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Petto di pollo vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More reconstituted chicken breast slices
View all →
b NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More from Coal
View all →
b NOVA 2 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 2 
d 
d 
b