Pate de coing

by emily 240 g in Fruit pastes Barcode 8426073516019
Poor nutritional quality
Processed food
Green-Score
b
Environmental impact estimate

Pate de coing by emily provides 288 kcal per 100 g, with 61 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Fruit pastes category and comes in a 240 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0.5 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
61 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 288 kcal 305 −5%
Total fat 0.5 g 0.9 −41%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 −100%
Carbohydrates 69 g 72.7 −5%
Total sugars 61 g 62.9
Added sugars 31.5 g 24.1 +31%
Dietary fiber 4.1 g 2.8 +45%
Protein 0.5 g 0.8 −36%
Salt 0 g 0.5 −96%

Category average across 581 Fruit pastes products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other fruit pastes

Calories lower 21%
Sugars lower 23%
Salt lower 20%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 62%
Fiber top 16%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

coing (58%), sucre et citron.

Palm oil freeMaybe veganVegetarian

Product details

Quantity
240 g
Labels & certifications
No preservativesGreen Dot
Sold in
France
Barcode
8426073516019

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Pate de coing?

Pate de coing contains 288 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Pate de coing?

Pate de coing has 61 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Pate de coing healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 17, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Pate de coing? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More fruit pastes

View all →

More from emily

View all →