View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Panko Japanese Style
Panko Japanese Style provides 367 kcal per 100 g, with 6.7 g of sugars and 13.3 g of protein. That is 48% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Bread crumbs category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 30 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 kcal | 110 kcal | 359 | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 3.2 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.7 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 80 g | 24 g | 9% | 71 +13% |
| Total sugars | 6.7 g | 2 g | 4.5 +48% | |
| Dietary fiber | 3.3 g | 1 g | 4% | 5.5 −40% |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 4 g | 8% | 11.9 +12% |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g | 1.6 −82% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 589 Bread crumbs products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from July 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other bread crumbs
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 30 g
- Sold in
- Canada
- Barcode
- 0041390050015
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Panko Japanese Style?
Panko Japanese Style contains 367 kcal per 100 g and about 110 kcal per serving (30 g).
How much sugar is in Panko Japanese Style?
Panko Japanese Style has 6.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Panko Japanese Style healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More bread crumbs
View all →
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
e NOVA 4 
a NOVA 3