Maple Chewnami Nibbles
Maple Chewnami Nibbles by Rising Tide Sea Vegetables provides 464 kcal per 100 g, with 17.9 g of sugars and 11.4 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Snacks category. Contains: sesame seeds.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 28 g (28 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 kcal | 130 kcal | 453 | |
| Total fat | 27.9 g | 7.8 g | 10% | 25.3 +10% |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 1 g | 5% | 6.8 −47% |
| Carbohydrates | 48.2 g | 13.5 g | 5% | 48.9 |
| Total sugars | 17.9 g | 5 g | 18.8 −5% | |
| Dietary fiber | 9.3 g | 2.6 g | 9% | 6.7 +38% |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 3.2 g | 6% | 13.3 −14% |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.3 g | 1.1 +5% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 35657 Snacks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other snacks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Sesame seeds,* wildcrafted kombu (kelp), brown rice syrup,* maple syrup.*
- Allergens
- Sesame seeds
Product details
- Serving size
- 28 g (28 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0630614000259
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Maple Chewnami Nibbles?
Maple Chewnami Nibbles contains 464 kcal per 100 g and about 130 kcal per serving (28 g (28 g)).
How much sugar is in Maple Chewnami Nibbles?
Maple Chewnami Nibbles has 17.9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Maple Chewnami Nibbles healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does Maple Chewnami Nibbles contain?
According to the label data it contains: Sesame seeds. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More snacks
View all →
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4