Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela

by Eroski in Beef Barcode 8480010293364
Average nutritional quality

Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela by Eroski provides 127 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 16 g of protein. That is 17% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Beef category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
5.2 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
2.2 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.5 g · Low
Salt
1.1 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 127 kcal 171 −26%
Total fat 5.2 g 9 −42%
Saturated fat 2.2 g 3.6 −39%
Carbohydrates 3.7 g 1.5 +140%
Total sugars 0.5 g 0.6 −17%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0.2 −100%
Protein 16 g 21 −24%
Salt 1.1 g 0.9 +26%

Category average across 1307 Beef products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other beef

Calories lower 32%
Sugars higher 36%
Salt higher 21%
Saturated fat lower 44%
Protein top 87%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No glutenNutriscoreNutriscore Grade C
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010293364

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela?

Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela contains 127 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela?

Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Hamburguesa vacuno Tsahal Okela? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More beef

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →