View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Griebenschmalz
Griebenschmalz by Ostermeier provides 663 kcal per 100 g, with 0.1 g of sugars and 9.1 g of protein. That is 93% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Animal fats category and comes in a 200g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 30 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 663 kcal | 199 kcal | 751 −12% | |
| Total fat | 69.5 g | 20.9 g | 27% | 80.8 −14% |
| Saturated fat | 29.6 g | 8.9 g | 45% | 35.4 −16% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.2 g | 0.1 g | 0% | 3.3 −94% |
| Total sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g | 1.4 −93% | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 2.7 g | 5% | 1.9 +383% |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.4 g | 0.5 +169% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 128 Animal fats products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other animal fats
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 200g
- Serving size
- 30 g
- Labels & certifications
- German Agricultural Society
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4001896150639
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Griebenschmalz?
Griebenschmalz contains 663 kcal per 100 g and about 199 kcal per serving (30 g).
How much sugar is in Griebenschmalz?
Griebenschmalz has 0.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Griebenschmalz healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 24, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 More animal fats
View all →
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
c NOVA 4 More from Ostermeier
View all →
NOVA 2 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e