View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Griebenschmalz
Griebenschmalz by Ostermeier provides 824 kcal per 100 g, with 0.1 g of sugars and 4.2 g of protein. That is 93% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Animal fats category and comes in a 200g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 200.0g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 824 kcal | 1,648 kcal | 751 +10% | |
| Total fat | 89.6 g | 179.2 g | 230% | 80.8 +11% |
| Saturated fat | 38.2 g | 76.4 g | 382% | 35.4 +8% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.2 g | 0.4 g | 0% | 3.3 −94% |
| Total sugars | 0.1 g | 0.2 g | 1.4 −93% | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 8.4 g | 17% | 1.9 +123% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 128 Animal fats products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other animal fats
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 200g
- Serving size
- 200.0g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4001896150608
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Recipe & label changes
-
September 21, 2026
- NOVA group: — → 2
Changes to this product's label data recorded since Foodmetria started tracking it.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Griebenschmalz?
Griebenschmalz contains 824 kcal per 100 g and about 1,648 kcal per serving (200.0g).
How much sugar is in Griebenschmalz?
Griebenschmalz has 0.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Griebenschmalz healthy?
It is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 21, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 More animal fats
View all →
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
c NOVA 4 More from Ostermeier
View all →
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e
e NOVA 2