View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Gorenjska zaseka
Gorenjska zaseka by Arvaj provides 732 kcal per 100 g, with 0.1 g of sugars and 7.7 g of protein. That is 74% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Lards category and comes in a 300 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 732 kcal | 808 −9% |
| Total fat | 77.5 g | 88 −12% |
| Saturated fat | 32.5 g | 36.8 −12% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 0.8 +31% |
| Total sugars | 0.1 g | 0.4 −74% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 2.7 +190% |
| Salt | 2 g | 0.9 +127% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 123 Lards products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other lards
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Hrbtna alanina, začimbe, kuhinjska sol, antioksidant: natrijev citrat, konzervans: natrijev acetat Navodilo za pripravo: tanko namažite na domač kruh. Po odprtju parabite do konca roka trajanja.
Product details
- Quantity
- 300 g
- Sold in
- Italy
- Barcode
- 3830010893241
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Gorenjska zaseka?
Gorenjska zaseka contains 732 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Gorenjska zaseka?
Gorenjska zaseka has 0.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Gorenjska zaseka healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 31, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 More lards
View all →
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d 
d NOVA 2 
d 
e