View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Filets de poulet
Filets de poulet by Bruno Siebert provides 108 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 25 g of protein. That is 35% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Chicken breasts category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 108 kcal | 121 −11% |
| Total fat | 0.8 g | 3 −73% |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.8 −75% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.5 g | 1.1 −56% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 +35% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
| Protein | 25 g | 22.3 +12% |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.7 −86% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 4162 Chicken breasts products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other chicken breasts
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Filets de poulet
Product details
- Labels & certifications
- French meatFrench poultryGreen Dot
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3343660011212
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Filets de poulet?
Filets de poulet contains 108 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Filets de poulet?
Filets de poulet has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Filets de poulet healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Filets de poulet vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 13, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More chicken breasts
View all →
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More from Bruno Siebert
View all →
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a 
a NOVA 1 
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 1