Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters
Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters by Fee Brothers provides 0 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Cooking helpers category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 dash (1 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal | 336 −100% | |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 5.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 54.6 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 19.1 −100% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 7.4 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 8.7 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 3.9 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1676 Cooking helpers products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from October 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other cooking helpers
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Water, glycerin, natural and artificial flavors, caramel color and tartaric acid
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1 dash (1 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0791863140674
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters?
Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters contains 0 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters?
Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Fee brothers, aztec chocolate bitters healthy?
It is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More cooking helpers
View all →
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
c 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 1